<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poker</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.desiringmachine.org/blog/2007/01/28/poker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.desiringmachine.org/blog/2007/01/28/poker/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:02:02 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Helen</title>
		<link>http://www.desiringmachine.org/blog/2007/01/28/poker/comment-page-1/#comment-4670</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 03:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.desiringmachine.org/blog/2007/01/28/poker/#comment-4670</guid>
		<description>Those 4 Dems are very conservative...I&#039;ll have to backtrack on some of the issues to explain why I say that.

Prohibition is alive and well as a modus operendi
at least in the mind of some.

I perfer deterritorialized as a concept rather than
the &quot;notion of sovereignty is so yesterday&quot;...whose,
yours or theirs...?

Expect a default response and lazy thinking until
we have Congress persons who are up to speed
with all things computer.  (Think Ted Stevens&#039;
tubes!)  How are Congress persons going to be
able to take an interest in something that is beyond
their scope?  Makes you wonder about those young
interns they hire that do all the research and foot
work!  (Gofors)

When I hear such terms as &quot;place bound&quot;, etc in
the everyday vernacular on the floor of Congress,
I will know that an idea whose time has come has
arrived!!

Some say JFK made some enemies when he removed the power to print money from the 
Federal Reserve Bank and gave it back to Congress.
I&#039;d need more information to really comment on
that one.  But it is being said that the creation of
the Federal Reserve is not what it seems to be.
It might be difficult to really get a good understanding of the banking system and the
influence it has.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those 4 Dems are very conservative&#8230;I&#8217;ll have to backtrack on some of the issues to explain why I say that.</p>
<p>Prohibition is alive and well as a modus operendi<br />
at least in the mind of some.</p>
<p>I perfer deterritorialized as a concept rather than<br />
the &#8220;notion of sovereignty is so yesterday&#8221;&#8230;whose,<br />
yours or theirs&#8230;?</p>
<p>Expect a default response and lazy thinking until<br />
we have Congress persons who are up to speed<br />
with all things computer.  (Think Ted Stevens&#8217;<br />
tubes!)  How are Congress persons going to be<br />
able to take an interest in something that is beyond<br />
their scope?  Makes you wonder about those young<br />
interns they hire that do all the research and foot<br />
work!  (Gofors)</p>
<p>When I hear such terms as &#8220;place bound&#8221;, etc in<br />
the everyday vernacular on the floor of Congress,<br />
I will know that an idea whose time has come has<br />
arrived!!</p>
<p>Some say JFK made some enemies when he removed the power to print money from the<br />
Federal Reserve Bank and gave it back to Congress.<br />
I&#8217;d need more information to really comment on<br />
that one.  But it is being said that the creation of<br />
the Federal Reserve is not what it seems to be.<br />
It might be difficult to really get a good understanding of the banking system and the<br />
influence it has.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
