2006
Aug 15

Interesting story about how an open source project adds “no military use” clause to the GPL. A lot of people seem to think this is a can of worms, futile, and misdirected step for an open source license. But I find it intriguing. And why not? If one spends a majority of his or her time and energy dedicated to a specific software project why shouldn’t they have a say in how it is used or misused. Of course there will always be those who point to the tricky problem of unintended consequences. However, this is a legitimate step as a conscientous objector, and follows a long venerable tradition.

One Response

  1. Helen Says:

    Did you know Murtha was one of only two who voted
    FOR the proposed reinstatment of the draft put forth
    by Wrangell. the vote was something like 400 to 2.
    Wrangell voted against it in the end. WASUP.

Leave a Comment




XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.